Hi all, I see there has been a lot going on, the “Big meeting” for one, and as I am told one of the directors lost his decorum. I wonder how much it would cost to get his inborn temperament sorted, or send them all on an Anger Management course as it seems that even the chair is a bit short on decorum. Money well spent I think.

From the minutes I see that we can be trusted to have a view on a project that will cost almost £29,000, yet when one that costs £72,000 and at the moment does not confirm to the articles of the Company we don’t get to? You have to ask why? What are they hiding?

The Directors agreed that Members should be asked for their views before proceeding, as the project will cost almost £29,000,

The constitution for the Friends of Lochluichart Church has been received.  The Solicitor will be asked to examine the constitution and, with OSCR, look at the eligibility of the project for funding in the light of the questions raised at the recent Members meeting (21 May 2015). Is this not desperate or what?

Definition of desperate: Someone who wants something so bad they will go to extreme lengths to get it.

Due to the questions around the interpretation of the legal constraints on the LCT, it was agreed that the Solicitor should attend future meetings – this will be reviewed as over time.

So we have to now pay for a Solicitor to hold their hands at what cost?  I hope that we get a proper itemised account for all the costs that have been incurred by the Company and Directors. Let’s hope it’s better than the minutes that we get to see.

Question For you all; what has an irreligionist and an opulent person has in common? The Answer, add in comment box as I know how shy you all are.

Until the next time, keep the faith.

F R